Anyone who is professionally involved in video editing today knows that the graphics card is very important during the editing process.
A good GPU not only determines how smoothly you can work in the timeline, but also how quickly color correction, effects, and other important functions are performed. Yet, it is often not very clear what you really need. Is a very expensive professional card worth its price? Or is a powerful consumer card sufficient? And how do Nvidia and AMD compare today?
read also
How do you choose a monitor?
Memory is Needed
Video editing is not just about pure computing power. A GPU must efficiently handle video files, multiple image and audio layers, and heavy effects. Sufficient video memory (VRAM) is crucial for this. Anyone working with 4K material will quickly need 12 to 16 GB. The speed of that memory, the bandwidth, is also important: the faster data can move between the GPU and memory, the smoother the preview will be.
In addition, modern GPUs have separate cores that can encode and decode video. As a result, they take over a large part of the heavy work from the CPU, which makes a big difference especially during export and live preview.
Nvidia GeForce or Professional?
Nvidia divides its range into two families: the GeForce series, aimed at consumers, gamers, and creative professionals, and the enterprise line, formerly known as Quadro, now RTX (Professional). That difference is less technical than many people think. The core of the chip is often identical, but the professional cards get different drivers and focus on stability. They are tested and certified for software such as DaVinci Resolve or Adobe Premiere Pro.
Yet, more expensive does not immediately mean better. The extra investment in an enterprise card is especially useful if you work in an environment where reliability is central, such as production houses or studios. For most self-employed people or SMEs, a GeForce RTX card is certainly sufficient. These cards nowadays also get “Studio Drivers” from Nvidia, which are intended for creative applications instead of games.
AMD: Cheaper with Strong Performance
AMD has firmly repositioned itself in the GPU market in recent years. Their Radeon cards offer a lot of computing power and good performance. Yet, Nvidia remains the safe choice for many professionals, mainly because of the broad software support. Many applications are optimized for CUDA, or Nvidia architecture, which sometimes causes headaches for AMD users with specific effects or plug-ins.
AMD cards are often cheaper with comparable performance, and energy efficiency and heat distribution have improved significantly. For those who mainly edit without major 3D effects, an AMD card is therefore an excellent alternative.
Do You Always Need a GPU?
Modern processors are more powerful than ever, and some have integrated graphics cores that also do their thing. Intel and AMD CPUs with strong integrated GPUs can handle light video editing, especially with Full HD material. New platforms such as Snapdragon X Elite also show that integrated graphics cards are also good.
These chips use an integrated memory, where the CPU and GPU have access to the same part. That makes copying data faster. Therefore, they are similar to Apple’s M1 chips. For simple video editing, light effects, and short projects, such systems are just as good. Only when you do heavier productions do you hit the limits.
GPUs with AI
In the high-end market, you have GPUs with large amounts of VRAM of 48 GB or more. That is useful if you work with neural networks or 3D scenes, but for pure video editing that is far too much. Video editing software mainly works on speed and stability, and often does not use a lot of memory. Yet, extra memory can be useful when applying software-based AI effects, such as automatic color correction or noise reduction.
More and more tools are using AI. Nvidia is responding strongly to this with its RTX architecture. AMD is lagging somewhat behind in that area, but their latest cards have comparable functions. Anyone who regularly uses AI therefore gets a little more benefit from a recent Nvidia GPU.
A powerful GeForce card, such as an RTX 5070 or 5080, offers an excellent mix of speed and stability, and is supported by virtually all popular video editing programs. In laptops, you often see these cards in series such as the HP Omen devices. AMD alternatives such as the Radeon RX 7800 XT or RX 7900 XTX offer comparable performance for a lower price, but your software must be compatible with AMD’s software ecosystem, including Vulkan.
Conclusion
The ideal GPU for video editing is therefore not necessarily the most expensive, but the one that best suits your work. For the self-employed, freelancers, and SMEs, a modern GeForce or Radeon is more than sufficient. Such cards offer excellent performance, good software support, and a much more attractive price tag. Nvidia also enthusiastically supports such use via the freely available Studio drivers. The professional RTX cards from Nvidia are especially interesting in a business context where several people work together on one project and ultimate reliability and stability are crucial.
Those who work lighter can even get started without a separate GPU thanks to the power of modern integrated chips such as the Snapdragon X Elite, or the premium CPUs from Intel and AMD. But those who regularly work with high resolutions, effects, or AI functions are better off investing in a full-fledged GPU. Ultimately, the best card is the one that supports your creative process and not the one with the highest specifications on paper.